Tag Archives: legal thriller

Black Diamond – John Dobbyn – 6/10

“To one who starts every day with a double jolt of Starbucks’ caffeine-drenched special, the offer of a cup of tea was like offering tofu to a carnivore.”

Michael’s childhood friend Danny is thrown from his horse during a race and dies of his injuries. A rival jockey, accused of pushing Danny off, comes to Michael’s legal practice for criminal defence. Certain that something bigger is afoot, Michael takes the case, but it is his loyalties to Danny’s wife that cause him the most danger in his quest for the truth, which will take him from Boston to the heart of Ireland…

I’m in two minds about Black Diamond. On the one hand, it was a rollicking crime novel, with level after level of baddie until Michael works his way right to the top. Any number of unsavoury characters and doubling-backs of plot avert our hero from justice.

Michael is a pleasant enough character but he’s altogether too flawless (multilingual, brilliant legal mind, rose from nothing so can establish a seamless rapport with both the poorest and the rich, beautiful girlfriend who seems prepared to rescue him from pretty much anything and never see him) and generally a bit stupid – he charges headfirst into all sorts of situations for which you’d think he’s too smart.

However, and this is a big however, the writing is pretty pedestrian. Clichés abounded  and the tone was, on the whole, too conversational – it might have worked brilliantly for an audiobook (particularly if the narrator was inclined to a Gaelic lilt), but it doesn’t work in print. And you can’t have an Irish character called Seamus McGuinness living in Killarney Street. It’s just too Irish. Like those huge green faux-velvet leprechaun hats worn by Guinness-chugging rugby fans. Most of the writing is a bit too Irish – I know that the point is to root the novel in a community, but EVERYONE was Irish (apart from a few Hispanic jockeys). Danny, Colleen, Erin, Mr. Devlin, Billy O’Connor… see my point?

“You could cut the profound silence with a cleaver” was the worst offence of the poor writing – the metaphor is somewhat mixed – surely pretty much anything can be cut with a cleaver; the indelicacy of the implement belies the point.

On the other hand, sometimes Dobbyn hit the right spot with a sentiment (see the tea comment at the start):

“I never lie to my secretary, except when it’s necessary to subdue her mothering instincts. This time, it took a bit of method acting. I was sure it was Scully, and no one had called him “harmless” since he left the crib.”

I wanted to give the book 8/10 for its devious mystery and Mafia-style baddies, but it loses 2 points for poor writing.

Additional info:
Kindly supplied by the publisher via Netgalley for an honest review.
Publisher: Oceanview Publishing, hardcover, 280 pages.
Pre-order Black Diamond from Amazon*
* this is an affiliate link – I will be paid a small percentage of your purchase price if you use this link, which goes towards giveaways.

The Last Juror – John Grisham – 8/10

So much better than The King of Torts. This is written by a young regional newspaper editor, an outsider in a small country
community – so much of the subject matter is social observation, alongside the
usual riveting legal case. We touch on segregation and de-segregation, mob
families, huge families, the role of an editor in a small town, insanity, the
Vietnam War, the popularisation of drugs, and the difficulties of being
accepted into a closed community, in 500 short pages (I whipped through it and
would have completed it easily in one sitting had I not been 5 days from
getting married and thus spewing organisational information from the eyeballs).

Because Grisham doesn’t rely on the thrill
of the money and the litigation, the pace is a little slower but much more
pleasant. He also takes the time to develop some great characters (the
Italian-speaking, 7 PhDs-raising chef extraordinaire Miss Callie has to be one
of his best creations) and entertaining atmosphere – the brand new editor
having war declared on him in a courtroom and delivered via a bomb, for example
– which puts this several shelves ahead of King of Torts.

I did enjoy sitting by my own private piece
of the River Cherwell in Oxford and reading this. A pleasant calm in the storm.

The King of Torts – John Grisham – 6/10

Maybe it’s because I’ve read some “high
class” literature now (although I’m still hardly “well-read”), but some of this novel felt shallow and
predictable. It was obvious from the minute J Clay Carter II (I still can’t
believe what some American parents inflict upon their children – although one
of the minor reasons I am looking forward to my wedding is that I will be able
to ditch the double-barrelled disaster that is currently my surname!) started
to make astronomical amounts of money that at some point it would all fall
apart.

Enthralling (took my mind off the wedding
stress for a few hours!), fun and the right thing happens in the end.

It feels like heresy to call John Grisham “Fluff” in the categories but really…

The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet’s Nest – Stieg Larsson – 10/10

Having now finished the third volume in Stieg Larsson’s worldwide bestselling Millennium trilogy, I have to say this has been one of my favourite reading experiences. I haven’t read many trilogies (Harry Potter ended up at 7 books and the Brontës stuck to stand-alone books…) but I enjoyed the way that the circle closed, we had proper character development and plot resolution and mostly just a good fun read! There was a really entertaining mix of detective work, courtroom drama, complex relationships, entertaining subplots and computer hacking throughout.

“Hornet’s Nest” was right back up to the excitement of “Dragon Tattoo” – I have to admit, I am a fan of courtroom drama involving feisty women wiping the floor with idiots, but there was also some good scheming and conniving among both the goodies and the baddies which was fun to follow (or try to follow – I got mixed up with all the surnames ending in –sson). “Played with Fire” is definitely required reading for “Hornet’s Nest” as the action picks up right where it left off at the end of Book Two (dealing with the aftermath of a shoot-out at the Goteberg Corral) so the adrenaline is racing from page 3. They fixed the translation issues in Book 3 too – I didn’t pick up on anything (although I did read the whole book while enormously jetlagged, so…).

So in “Hornet’s Nest” (without giving anything away), Lisbeth somehow survives being shot, Blomkvist puts together the defence against the murder charges made against her, the Swedish secret police are being very bad indeed and are busy corrupting the “everyday” police and lots of bad guys die. Also there’s a massive giant who can’t feel pain, and Erika gets a crazy stalker after she moves jobs.

I think I need a break from Swedish surnames for a while though.

Other bloggers’ thoughts: Literate Housewife, New York Times Sunday Book Review, The Millions

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 553 other followers